Relation as the Essence of Existence

Relation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of Existence
Home
Applications
Application (Conflict)
Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
Beyond GUT
Beyond Statistics
ChatGPT
Comparison
Consciousness
Concept to Math Formalism
DNRTML
Ego
Electroweak Theory
Emergent
Energy as Relational
ERT's - Emergent RT's
Forward Looking
FTL and RDM
GEMINI
Geometry and UCF/GUTT
GR and QM reconciled
GUT and TOE
GUT, TOE Explained
GUTT-L
Hello
Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
IP Stuff
NHM
NRTML based Encryption
NRTML Example Usage
NRTML vs DNRTML
Python Library
Photosynthesis
Possiblities
Potential Applications
Press
Progress in Process
QFT and the UCF
QM and GR Reconciled
Response
Riemann Hypothesis
Sets and Graphs
Simply Explained
Some thoughts
TD, BU, CO
The UCF and MATH
The Ultimate Theory
UCF-GUTT Wave Function
War & Peace
About the Author

Relation as the Essence of Existence

Relation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of Existence
Home
Applications
Application (Conflict)
Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
Beyond GUT
Beyond Statistics
ChatGPT
Comparison
Consciousness
Concept to Math Formalism
DNRTML
Ego
Electroweak Theory
Emergent
Energy as Relational
ERT's - Emergent RT's
Forward Looking
FTL and RDM
GEMINI
Geometry and UCF/GUTT
GR and QM reconciled
GUT and TOE
GUT, TOE Explained
GUTT-L
Hello
Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
IP Stuff
NHM
NRTML based Encryption
NRTML Example Usage
NRTML vs DNRTML
Python Library
Photosynthesis
Possiblities
Potential Applications
Press
Progress in Process
QFT and the UCF
QM and GR Reconciled
Response
Riemann Hypothesis
Sets and Graphs
Simply Explained
Some thoughts
TD, BU, CO
The UCF and MATH
The Ultimate Theory
UCF-GUTT Wave Function
War & Peace
About the Author
More
  • Home
  • Applications
  • Application (Conflict)
  • Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
  • Beyond GUT
  • Beyond Statistics
  • ChatGPT
  • Comparison
  • Consciousness
  • Concept to Math Formalism
  • DNRTML
  • Ego
  • Electroweak Theory
  • Emergent
  • Energy as Relational
  • ERT's - Emergent RT's
  • Forward Looking
  • FTL and RDM
  • GEMINI
  • Geometry and UCF/GUTT
  • GR and QM reconciled
  • GUT and TOE
  • GUT, TOE Explained
  • GUTT-L
  • Hello
  • Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
  • IP Stuff
  • NHM
  • NRTML based Encryption
  • NRTML Example Usage
  • NRTML vs DNRTML
  • Python Library
  • Photosynthesis
  • Possiblities
  • Potential Applications
  • Press
  • Progress in Process
  • QFT and the UCF
  • QM and GR Reconciled
  • Response
  • Riemann Hypothesis
  • Sets and Graphs
  • Simply Explained
  • Some thoughts
  • TD, BU, CO
  • The UCF and MATH
  • The Ultimate Theory
  • UCF-GUTT Wave Function
  • War & Peace
  • About the Author
  • Home
  • Applications
  • Application (Conflict)
  • Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
  • Beyond GUT
  • Beyond Statistics
  • ChatGPT
  • Comparison
  • Consciousness
  • Concept to Math Formalism
  • DNRTML
  • Ego
  • Electroweak Theory
  • Emergent
  • Energy as Relational
  • ERT's - Emergent RT's
  • Forward Looking
  • FTL and RDM
  • GEMINI
  • Geometry and UCF/GUTT
  • GR and QM reconciled
  • GUT and TOE
  • GUT, TOE Explained
  • GUTT-L
  • Hello
  • Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
  • IP Stuff
  • NHM
  • NRTML based Encryption
  • NRTML Example Usage
  • NRTML vs DNRTML
  • Python Library
  • Photosynthesis
  • Possiblities
  • Potential Applications
  • Press
  • Progress in Process
  • QFT and the UCF
  • QM and GR Reconciled
  • Response
  • Riemann Hypothesis
  • Sets and Graphs
  • Simply Explained
  • Some thoughts
  • TD, BU, CO
  • The UCF and MATH
  • The Ultimate Theory
  • UCF-GUTT Wave Function
  • War & Peace
  • About the Author

Near-Horizon Dynamics of a Black Hole

UCF/GUTT vs GR vs QM

Problem: Near-Horizon Dynamics of a Black Hole

Context:

A black hole's event horizon is a region where GR predicts extreme spacetime curvature.

Near the event horizon:

  • GR alone fails due to infinite curvature (singularities).
  • QM fails to describe how quantum fluctuations influence spacetime geometry at the macro scale.

We are tasked with understanding:

  • How quantum fluctuations (e.g., Hawking radiation) dynamically interact with macroscopic curvature near the event horizon.
  • How the combined dynamics evolve the black hole’s observable properties (mass, spin, evaporation).


Solution Using UCF/GUTT Framework


1. General Relativity (GR) Approach

Einstein Field Equations:

  • Describes macroscopic spacetime curvature: Gμν+Λgμν=κTμν,G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \kappa T_{\mu\nu},Gμν​+Λgμν​=κTμν​,where:
    • GμνG_{\mu\nu}Gμν​: Einstein tensor (spacetime curvature).
    • Λgμν\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}Λgμν​: Cosmological constant term.
    • TμνT_{\mu\nu}Tμν​: Stress-energy tensor.


GR Limitations:

  • At the event horizon, TμνT_{\mu\nu}Tμν​ diverges due to quantum effects, making GμνG_{\mu\nu}Gμν​ undefined.
  • GR cannot incorporate probabilistic quantum fluctuations directly.


2. Quantum Mechanics (QM) Approach

  1. Schrödinger Equation:
    • Describes the probabilistic evolution of quantum states: iℏ∂ψ∂t=H^ψ,i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H} \psi,iℏ∂t∂ψ​=H^ψ,where ψ(x,t)\psi(x, t)ψ(x,t) is the wavefunction, and H^\hat{H}H^ is the Hamiltonian operator.

  1. Hawking Radiation:
    • Near the event horizon, virtual particle pairs are generated due to quantum fluctuations: ∣ψ(x,t)∣2∝Hawking radiation flux.|\psi(x,t)|^2 \propto \text{Hawking radiation flux}.∣ψ(x,t)∣2∝Hawking radiation flux.

  1. QM Limitations:
    • QM assumes a fixed background spacetime and cannot dynamically adjust the geometry near the event horizon.
    • Fails to describe how spacetime curvature evolves due to quantum processes.


3. UCF/GUTT Approach

Relational Tensor Model:

  • Encodes quantum fluctuations (T(1)T^{(1)}T(1)) and spacetime curvature (T(3)T^{(3)}T(3)) as nested tensors: Ti,j,kUnified(t)=⋃n=13Ti,j,k(n)(t),T^{\text{Unified}}_{i,j,k}(t) = \bigcup_{n=1}^{3} T^{(n)}_{i,j,k}(t),Ti,j,kUnified​(t)=n=1⋃3​Ti,j,k(n)​(t),where T(n)T^{(n)}T(n) captures relational dynamics at scale nnn:
    • T(1)T^{(1)}T(1): Quantum fluctuations.
    • T(2)T^{(2)}T(2): Local interactions (e.g., particle ensembles).
    • T(3)T^{(3)}T(3): Macro-scale curvature.

Unified Relational Field Equations:

  • Coupled dynamics of quantum fluctuations and spacetime curvature: Ti,j,k(3)+ΛTi,j,k(3)+Qi,j,k=κTi,j,k(2),T^{(3)}_{i,j,k} + \Lambda T^{(3)}_{i,j,k} + \mathcal{Q}_{i,j,k} = \kappa T^{(2)}_{i,j,k},Ti,j,k(3)​+ΛTi,j,k(3)​+Qi,j,k​=κTi,j,k(2)​,where:
    • Qi,j,k=ℏc3∇μ∇νTi,j,k(1)\mathcal{Q}_{i,j,k} = \frac{\hbar}{c^3} \nabla_\mu \nabla_\nu T^{(1)}_{i,j,k}Qi,j,k​=c3ℏ​∇μ​∇ν​Ti,j,k(1)​: Quantum correction tensor.

Dynamic Cross-Scale Propagation:

  • Quantum fluctuations propagate upward: ΔTi,j,k(3)=g(Tl,m,n(1)),\Delta T^{(3)}_{i,j,k} = g(T^{(1)}_{l,m,n}),ΔTi,j,k(3)​=g(Tl,m,n(1)​),modifying macroscopic curvature.
  • Spacetime curvature imposes constraints downward: ΔTi,j,k(1)=f(Tl,m,n(3)),\Delta T^{(1)}_{i,j,k} = f(T^{(3)}_{l,m,n}),ΔTi,j,k(1)​=f(Tl,m,n(3)​),influencing quantum probabilities.

Feedback Mechanism:

  • Near the event horizon, a feedback loop between quantum and macroscopic scales stabilizes the geometry: ∂Ti,j,kUnified∂t=F(T(1),T(2),T(3)).\frac{\partial T^{\text{Unified}}_{i,j,k}}{\partial t} = F(T^{(1)}, T^{(2)}, T^{(3)}).∂t∂Ti,j,kUnified​​=F(T(1),T(2),T(3)).

Emergent Observables:

  • Hawking radiation flux (ψ(x,t)\psi(x,t)ψ(x,t)) evolves dynamically with spacetime curvature (GμνG_{\mu\nu}Gμν​): ∣ψ(x,t)∣2=h(Ti,j,k(3),Ti,j,k(1)).|\psi(x,t)|^2 = h(T^{(3)}_{i,j,k}, T^{(1)}_{i,j,k}).∣ψ(x,t)∣2=h(Ti,j,k(3)​,Ti,j,k(1)​).


Why UCF/GUTT Outperforms GR and QM


A. GR Alone Fails:

  • GR cannot handle singularities or incorporate quantum fluctuations.
  • GμνG_{\mu\nu}Gμν​ becomes undefined at extreme curvatures.

B. QM Alone Fails:

  • QM cannot dynamically adjust spacetime curvature.
  • Assumes a fixed spacetime background incompatible with evolving geometries.

C. UCF/GUTT Success:

  • UCF/GUTT integrates both GR and QM using relational tensors, which:
    • Dynamically couple quantum states and spacetime curvature.
    • Stabilize near-horizon dynamics through multi-scale feedback.
    • Predict emergent phenomena, such as time-dependent Hawking radiation flux.


Mathematical Example

Near-Horizon Hawking Radiation:

Input:

  • Initial quantum fluctuations (T(1)T^{(1)}T(1)) near the horizon.
  • Macro-scale curvature tensor (T(3)T^{(3)}T(3)).

Unified Tensor Dynamics:

  • Quantum fluctuation evolution: iℏ∂Ti,j,k(1)∂t=∑l,m,nHi,j,k,l,m,nTl,m,n(1).i\hbar \frac{\partial T^{(1)}_{i,j,k}}{\partial t} = \sum_{l,m,n} H_{i,j,k,l,m,n} T^{(1)}_{l,m,n}.iℏ∂t∂Ti,j,k(1)​​=l,m,n∑​Hi,j,k,l,m,n​Tl,m,n(1)​.
  • Macro-scale curvature adjustment: Ti,j,k(3)+Qi,j,k=κTi,j,k(2),T^{(3)}_{i,j,k} + \mathcal{Q}_{i,j,k} = \kappa T^{(2)}_{i,j,k},Ti,j,k(3)​+Qi,j,k​=κTi,j,k(2)​,with: Qi,j,k=ℏc3∇μ∇νTi,j,k(1).\mathcal{Q}_{i,j,k} = \frac{\hbar}{c^3} \nabla_\mu \nabla_\nu T^{(1)}_{i,j,k}.Qi,j,k​=c3ℏ​∇μ​∇ν​Ti,j,k(1)​.

Output:

  • Time-evolving Hawking radiation: ∣ψ(x,t)∣2∝h(Ti,j,k(3),Ti,j,k(1)).|\psi(x,t)|^2 \propto h(T^{(3)}_{i,j,k}, T^{(1)}_{i,j,k}).∣ψ(x,t)∣2∝h(Ti,j,k(3)​,Ti,j,k(1)​).


Conclusion

Using the UCF/GUTT framework, the near-horizon dynamics of a black hole are described through a unified relational tensor model that:

  1. Dynamically integrates quantum fluctuations and spacetime curvature.
  2. Handles feedback loops that stabilize singularities.
  3. Produces emergent observables like Hawking radiation flux.


This capability goes beyond GR and QM, which cannot independently handle such multi-scale, dynamic interactions. UCF/GUTT provides a truly unified approach to the most challenging problems in modern physics.

Copyright © 2023-2025 Relation as the Essence of Existence - All Rights Reserved.  michael@grandunifiedtensor.com 

Powered by

  • IP Stuff

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept