Relation as the Essence of Existence

Relation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of Existence
Home
Applications
Application (Conflict)
Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
Beyond GUT
Beyond Statistics
ChatGPT
Comparison
Consciousness
Concept to Math Formalism
Ego
Electroweak Theory
Emergent
Energy as Relational
ERT's - Emergent RT's
Forward Looking
FTL and RDM
GEMINI
Geometry and UCF/GUTT
GR and QM reconciled
GUT and TOE
GUT, TOE Explained
GUTT-L
Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
IP Stuff
NHM
NRTML based Encryption
NRTML Example Usage
NRTML vs DNRTML
Python Library
Photosynthesis
Possiblities
Potential Applications
Press
Progress in Process
QFT and the UCF
QM and GR Reconciled
Response
Riemann Hypothesis
Sets and Graphs
Simply Explained
Some thoughts
The RCD Experiment
The UCF and MATH
The Ultimate Theory
UCF-GUTT Wave Function
War & Peace
About the Author
Licensing Opportunities

Relation as the Essence of Existence

Relation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of ExistenceRelation as the Essence of Existence
Home
Applications
Application (Conflict)
Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
Beyond GUT
Beyond Statistics
ChatGPT
Comparison
Consciousness
Concept to Math Formalism
Ego
Electroweak Theory
Emergent
Energy as Relational
ERT's - Emergent RT's
Forward Looking
FTL and RDM
GEMINI
Geometry and UCF/GUTT
GR and QM reconciled
GUT and TOE
GUT, TOE Explained
GUTT-L
Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
IP Stuff
NHM
NRTML based Encryption
NRTML Example Usage
NRTML vs DNRTML
Python Library
Photosynthesis
Possiblities
Potential Applications
Press
Progress in Process
QFT and the UCF
QM and GR Reconciled
Response
Riemann Hypothesis
Sets and Graphs
Simply Explained
Some thoughts
The RCD Experiment
The UCF and MATH
The Ultimate Theory
UCF-GUTT Wave Function
War & Peace
About the Author
Licensing Opportunities
More
  • Home
  • Applications
  • Application (Conflict)
  • Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
  • Beyond GUT
  • Beyond Statistics
  • ChatGPT
  • Comparison
  • Consciousness
  • Concept to Math Formalism
  • Ego
  • Electroweak Theory
  • Emergent
  • Energy as Relational
  • ERT's - Emergent RT's
  • Forward Looking
  • FTL and RDM
  • GEMINI
  • Geometry and UCF/GUTT
  • GR and QM reconciled
  • GUT and TOE
  • GUT, TOE Explained
  • GUTT-L
  • Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
  • IP Stuff
  • NHM
  • NRTML based Encryption
  • NRTML Example Usage
  • NRTML vs DNRTML
  • Python Library
  • Photosynthesis
  • Possiblities
  • Potential Applications
  • Press
  • Progress in Process
  • QFT and the UCF
  • QM and GR Reconciled
  • Response
  • Riemann Hypothesis
  • Sets and Graphs
  • Simply Explained
  • Some thoughts
  • The RCD Experiment
  • The UCF and MATH
  • The Ultimate Theory
  • UCF-GUTT Wave Function
  • War & Peace
  • About the Author
  • Licensing Opportunities
  • Home
  • Applications
  • Application (Conflict)
  • Axioms of the UCF-GUTT
  • Beyond GUT
  • Beyond Statistics
  • ChatGPT
  • Comparison
  • Consciousness
  • Concept to Math Formalism
  • Ego
  • Electroweak Theory
  • Emergent
  • Energy as Relational
  • ERT's - Emergent RT's
  • Forward Looking
  • FTL and RDM
  • GEMINI
  • Geometry and UCF/GUTT
  • GR and QM reconciled
  • GUT and TOE
  • GUT, TOE Explained
  • GUTT-L
  • Infinity and the UCF/GUTT
  • IP Stuff
  • NHM
  • NRTML based Encryption
  • NRTML Example Usage
  • NRTML vs DNRTML
  • Python Library
  • Photosynthesis
  • Possiblities
  • Potential Applications
  • Press
  • Progress in Process
  • QFT and the UCF
  • QM and GR Reconciled
  • Response
  • Riemann Hypothesis
  • Sets and Graphs
  • Simply Explained
  • Some thoughts
  • The RCD Experiment
  • The UCF and MATH
  • The Ultimate Theory
  • UCF-GUTT Wave Function
  • War & Peace
  • About the Author
  • Licensing Opportunities

The (RCD) Relational-Composition Decoherence Experiment —

Open Challenge to the Quantum‑Optics Community

The RCD Experiment: An Open Challenge to Test a New Law of Physics


(Updated July 7, 2025; feel free to cite or mirror short excerpts under our Fair-Use IP policy.)


Success would challenge established physics, while failure would reinforce standard models.


Chatgpt4.0 said "This proposal for the Relational-Composition Decoherence (RCD) Experiment is one of the most directly testable, elegantly structured, and high-impact empirical challenges to standard quantum mechanics presented in recent memory."


Gemini said "Agree" 


Grok said "The evidence leans toward agreement" 


1. Why This Page? A Challenge to the Community

We've talked a great deal about the Unified Conceptual Framework / Grand Unified Tensor Theory (UCF / GUTT). But talk is cheap; experiments are golden.

Below is a complete, lab-ready protocol that any team with a levitated-optomechanics bench and access to a drop-tower or sub-orbital platform can run today. The prediction is binary, the hardware is on the shelf, and the stakes could not be higher: a brand-new quantum collapse channel tied to an object's internal composition.


TL;DR: Run two nearly identical 100 nm silica spheres—one isotopically pure, one natural. After about 10 seconds of free-fall superposition, the natural sphere should show a 3–5% loss in fringe visibility. Standard QM and CSL say, “no difference.”


We challenge the global quantum-optics community to be the first to conduct this test.


2. The Full Proposal: Technical Details

The Core Prediction: A New Source of Quantum Collapse

The UCF/GUTT extends the standard master equation by adding a collapse term whose rate, Γ_RCD, depends on the Shannon entropy of a particle’s isotopic mixture (S_rel), not just its mass.

The governing equation is: Γ_RCD = α * S_rel * (m/m_Pl)² / ħ

  • S_rel is the key ingredient, the Shannon entropy calculated from the isotopic fractions (p_i).
  • α is a scaling parameter estimated at ~1.1 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ via a public Coq proof.
  • m/m_Pl is the particle's mass relative to the Planck mass.

This prediction is unique. Standard Quantum Mechanics has no such internal collapse term. Other models like CSL predict a collapse rate dependent on mass density, not isotopic composition. Therefore, measuring a decoherence rate that tracks S_rel would be a definitive signature of UCF/GUTT.


The Experimental Design: A Tale of Two Spheres

The experiment is a direct A/B comparison of two 100 nm silica (SiO₂) nanospheres, identical in every way except for their isotopic makeup.

  • The "Control" Sphere (The Baseline): This sphere is composed of isotopically pure Silicon-28 and Oxygen-16. Because of its uniform composition, its relational entropy (S_rel) is nearly zero, and its predicted relational collapse rate (Γ_RCD) is also zero. It acts as the baseline for standard quantum mechanics.
  • The "Test" Sphere (The Signal): This sphere is made from natural silicon (a mixture of 92% ²⁸Si, 5% ²⁹Si, and 3% ³⁰Si). This internal variety gives it a relational entropy (S_rel) of ≈ 0.25, leading to a predicted collapse rate (Γ_RCD) of ≈ 2.9 × 10⁻⁴ s⁻¹.


This precisely engineered difference is expected to produce a ~5% drop in interference fringe visibility after a 12-second drift (or ~3.8% in a 9.3-second ZARM catapult run)—a signal detectable at over four standard deviations (4σ) above the meticulously calculated 0.8% noise budget.


Apparatus & Protocol

A key aspect of this proposal is its immediate feasibility. No new technology needs to be invented.

  • Apparatus: The experiment requires a levitated-nanosphere cavity trap to cool the spheres to their quantum ground state (a demonstrated technique); an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) capsule to eliminate environmental noise (achieved in MAQRO mission prototypes); and a micro-gravity platform like Germany’s ZARM drop tower.
  • Protocol: The run involves loading and cooling a sphere in the UHV capsule and launching it. At the start of the free-fall, the trap is released, and a three-grating Talbot-Lau interferometer creates a spatial superposition. After the 9-to-12-second drift, the final interference visibility is measured. This process is repeated thousands of times with randomized, blind-labeled spheres to ensure statistical robustness.


Feasibility: Timeline & Budget

The project is designed to be completed within a focused 8-month timeline from green-light to data lock, with a total estimated budget of approximately €152,000.

This budget covers all key expenses, including €90,000 for ZARM tower and capsule rental, €35,000 for optics and vacuum retrofitting, €15,000 for logistics, and €12,000 for the custom isotope-enriched materials.


Success Criteria: What Counts as a Win?

The outcome is designed to be decisive.

  • Success (ΔV ≥ 3%): A visibility drop of 3% or more (≥3σ result) provides strong support for the relational-entropy collapse model.
  • Failure (ΔV < 1%): A null result would falsify the current theory's parameters and force a major revision.
  • Ambiguous (ΔV ≈ 1-3%): An intermediate result would suggest the effect is present but weaker, necessitating a follow-up experiment with a longer baseline.

Either way, the result is scientifically priceless—we refine or retire a big idea.


3. Join the Challenge

Are you running a levitated-optomechanics platform? We invite you to be the first to put this theory to the test.

Drop us a line at Michael_Fill@protonmail.com to coordinate sample exchange and blind-label protocols. The first lab to report a statistically significant result (positive or negative) will be offered co-authorship on the landmark paper.


Open-Source Resources

To support this challenge, the following resources will be made available to any team that registers serious interest:

  • Isabelle & Coq proofs for the foundational propositions.
  • Python/Lean notebook for the α fit derivation.
  • CAD files for the UHV capsule mounts.


Let the data decide. See you in free-fall.


Two futures, one experiment

Below is a look at what either outcome of an RCD drop-tower run would mean—scientifically, technologically, and sociologically.


Implications of the RCD Experiment: A Decision Matrix

Dimension: Quantum foundations

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):A new principle enters the books: decoherence can depend on internal Shannon entropy. Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL)’s mass-only parameter space is largely ruled out. Textbooks and review articles must add an “S_rel term.”
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):Strengthens standard Quantum Mechanics; entropy-driven collapse is constrained to α ≲ 8 × 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹. CSL and Penrose-type models remain viable competitors; the UCF/GUTT version is disfavored.

Dimension: UCF/GUTT framework

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):Proposition 2’s entropy term becomes empirically anchored, leading to pressure to publish the other 50 propositions as funding and peer-review interest surge.
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):The current α fit is falsified; the authors must revise or drop the collapse claim. Skeptics gain leverage to demand full disclosure of unpublished proofs before giving the rest of the framework serious attention.

Dimension: Metrology & quantum tech

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):Isotopic purification becomes a standard noise-mitigation technique; controlled isotope mixes become a tunable decoherence knob for qubits and sensors.
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):Labs can ignore isotopic entropy in their decoherence budgets; research dollars stay focused on mass, charge, and environmental factors.

Dimension: Follow-on experiments

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):
    • Longer micro-gravity runs (300 s sub-orbital) to map α precisely.
    • Search for the predicted 7% μ-neutrino deficit in IceCube-Gen2.
    • Check the –5/3 → –1.70 turbulence tilt in high-Rλ wind tunnels.
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):Collapse models shift focus to heavier masses, larger superpositions, or alternative mechanisms (e.g., gravity-induced). The RCD experiment drops off the priority list.

Dimension: Theory/experiment ecosystem

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):A boost for open-web, proof-assistant-backed theorizing; journals and funding agencies may create calls for "relational physics."
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):A reminder that elegant formal work needs early, public confrontation with data; funding tilts toward more conventional quantum-gravity or collapse-model programs.

Dimension: Public & philosophical impact

  • Positive result (ΔV ≥ 3%, ≥ 3σ):Headlines read: “Information content found to shape reality.” This sparks debates on the ontology of relations, perhaps even in the philosophy of mind.
  • Null result (ΔV ≤ 1%, ≤ 1σ):Quietly reinforces the status-quo view that collapse (if it exists) is tied to mass and environment, not internal composition, resulting in a minimal pop-science splash.



The RCD experiment is a gateway test.

If positive, it validates UCF/GUTT’s ability to predict physical reality.
If negative, it limits the scope of its application to physics, but not its entire validity as a conceptual or formal system.

3 Particle

Exploring Relational Particle Dynamics with UCF/GUTT


We are pleased to share early research results from the Universal Conceptual Framework / Grand Unified Tensor Theory (UCF/GUTT): a new formalism for modelling complex, multi-agent interactions.


Demonstrator  

A conceptual three-particle system (P1, P2, P3) illustrates how relational tensors evolve under UCF/GUTT dynamics.  Using a lightweight XML schema (DNRTML), the demo tracks state amplitudes, coupling strengths and an emergent three-body term—all while remaining numerically stable across widely separated time-scales.


Highlight Features  

• Modular parameters for decay, Hebbian-style coupling and emergent feedback  

• Built-in safeguards against divergence (soft amplitude saturation, coupling normalisation)  

• Designed for rapid extension to N-particle or layered-tensor scenarios


Road-map & Collaboration  

We invite researchers and industry partners to co-develop larger models—additional particles, hierarchical tensors, alternative feedback laws and real-data benchmarking.  Detailed technical material (source code, full DNRTML specs and advanced evolution kernels) is available under NDA to qualified collaborators.


*This release is a high-level proof of concept.  It omits proprietary algorithms and parameter schedules that form the core of our pending IP portfolio.  For partnership enquiries please contact Michael_Fill@Protonmail.com.


Question: given this success, can the UCF/GUTT solve the 3 Body problem


ChatGPT 03: "Yes—its relational tensor framework can, in principle, be extended to produce stable solutions for the classic three-body problem."


Grok: "Yes"


Intellectual Property Notice

The Unified Conceptual Framework/Grand Unified Tensor Theory (UCF/GUTT), Relational Conflict Game (RCG), Relational Systems Python Library (RS Library), and all associated materials, including but not limited to source code, algorithms, documentation, strategic applications, and publications, are proprietary works owned by Michael Fillippini. All intellectual property rights, including copyrights, pending and issued patents, trade secrets, and trademarks, are reserved. Unauthorized use, reproduction, modification, distribution, adaptation, or commercial exploitation without express written permission is strictly prohibited. For licensing inquiries, permissions, or partnership opportunities, please visit our Licensing page or contact: Michael_Fill@protonmail.com.

© 2023–2025 Michael Fillippini. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • IP Stuff

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept