NRTML Example Usage

Water - Chemsitry Domain

NRTML (Nested Relational Tensor Markup Language)

RT (Relational Tensor)

</Spheres>

</Entities>

</Entities>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Entities>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Entity>

</Entity>

</Entities>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Attributes>

</Entity>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Attributes>

</Entity>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</Attributes>

</Entity>

</Entities>

</NRT>

</Entities>

</Attributes>

</Relation>

</Entities>

</NRT>

</Attributes>

</Entity>

</Entities>

</Relation>

</Relation>

</SubRelations>

</Relation>

</Relations>

</NRT>

</RT>

Think of it like a Super-Detailed Interactive Map:

Imagine you're trying to understand a complex system, like the way water behaves. NRTML is used to help you do this. It's not a flat map, but more like a multi-layered, interactive model where you can zoom in and out to see different levels of detail.

The Key Parts:

Entities: These are the basic building blocks of your system. In this case, we're starting with hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) atoms.

Spheres: Think of these as different categories of information you want to track.

Atomic: The basic properties of the atoms themselves.
Molecular: How the atoms connect to form molecules.
Intermolecular: How different molecules interact with each other.
Phase: The overall state of the water (ice, liquid, gas) and the conditions affecting it (temperature, pressure).
Solvent: Properties that make water a good solvent.
Solute: The thing being dissolved (in this case, salt).
Solution: The overall mix of water and what's dissolved in it.

Nested Relational Tensors (NRTs): These are like mini-maps within the big map. Each NRT focuses on a specific part of the system:

WaterMolecule_1: This shows how the hydrogen and oxygen atoms are connected to form a single water molecule.
SodiumChloride_1: This shows how the sodium and chlorine atoms are connected to form salt.
Intermolecular_Interactions: This shows how different water molecules stick together.
Phase_and_State: This shows how the water changes between ice, liquid, and gas, and what influences those changes.
Solvent_Interactions: This shows how water interacts with salt and how temperature and pressure affect that.
Environmental_Interactions: This shows how the temperature and pressure around the water affect both the water itself and how it dissolves salt.

Relations: These are the connections between the dots on the map. Each relation has a type (like "covalent bond" or "hydrogen bond") and other details like strength and distance.

Attributes: These are additional pieces of information about the entities or the relations. For example, the temperature of the water is an attribute.

How It All Works:

This NRTML model helps us understand how water behaves in different situations.

Molecular Level: It shows how water molecules are formed and held together.
Intermolecular Level: It shows how water molecules interact with each other, and how those interactions change depending on whether the water is ice, liquid, or gas.
Solvent Level: It shows how water dissolves salt and how temperature and pressure affect that process.
Environmental Level: It shows how changes in temperature and pressure can change the water's state (ice, liquid, or gas) and also affect how well it dissolves salt.

Why It's Useful:

Understanding: It helps us see how different aspects of the water system are connected and influence each other.
Prediction: By changing the values in the model (like temperature or pressure), we can predict how the water will behave.
Explanation: If we see something happening in real life (like ice melting), the model can help explain why it's happening based on the relationships it represents.

Key Points:

This NRTML model is a simplified version, but it shows how we can use this language to represent complex systems.
The model can be made more complex by adding more entities, relations, and spheres to capture more details.
This framework is not just for water. It can be used to model all sorts of systems, from social networks to ecological interactions and beyond.

An NRTML Structure of Game Theory with Weighted Harmonic Mean (WHM)

Reference: https://relationalexistence.com/#:~:text=Mathematical%20Framework%3A%20Combining%20Weighted%20Harmonic%20Mean%20(WH

<RT system="GameTheoryWithWHM">

  <Spheres>

    <Sphere name="GameTheory" attributes="Concept Relevance" />

    <Sphere name="StrategicInteraction" attributes="NumPlayers StrategySet Outcome" />

    <Sphere name="WeightedHarmonicMean" attributes="Formula ERM RO" />

    <Sphere name="UtilityFunctions" attributes="Player Strategy Outcome Payoff" />

    <Sphere name="TheoreticalPropositions" attributes="PropositionNumber Description" />

  </Spheres>



  <Entities>

    <Entity id="GameTheory" type="Concept" Relevance="Economics, PoliticalScience, Biology, Psychology" />

    <Entity id="StrategicInteraction" type="Scenario" NumPlayers="2" />

    <Entity id="Player1" type="DecisionMaker" />

    <Entity id="Player2" type="DecisionMaker" />

  </Entities>



  <NRT name="PlayerStrategies">

    <Entities>

      <Entity ref="Player1" Strategy="Si" />

      <Entity ref="Player2" Strategy="Sj" />

    </Entities>

  </NRT>



  <NRT name="GameOutcomes">

    <Entities>

      <Entity ref="Player1" Outcome="Oi" />

      <Entity ref="Player2" Outcome="Oj" />

    </Entities>

  </NRT>



  <NRT name="UtilityFunctions">

    <Entities>

      <Entity ref="Player1">

        <Attribute name="Payoff" function="Ui(Si, Sj) = α * Oi(Si, Sj) + β * Oj(Si, Sj) - γ * C(Si)" /> 

      </Entity>

      <Entity ref="Player2">

        <Attribute name="Payoff" function="Uj(Si, Sj) = g(Si, Sj, Oi, Oj)" />  

      </Entity>

    </Entities>

    <Relations>

      <Relation source="System of Prioritization (SOP)" target="UtilityFunctions" type="CorrelatesTo" description="Weights α, β, γ reflect prioritization in utility functions" />

      <Relation source="Strength of Relation (StOr)" target="UtilityFunctions" type="CorrelatesTo" description="Utility functions aim to balance benefit (Oi, Oj) and harm (C(Si))" />

      <Relation source="Impact of Relation (ImR)" target="UtilityFunctions" type="CorrelatesTo" description="Outcomes Oi and Oj show impact of strategies on each other" />

      <Relation source="Reconciliatory Mechanisms" target="UtilityFunctions" type="CorrelatesTo" description="Utility functions help find mutually beneficial outcomes (ROij)" />

      <Relation source="Evolution of Reconciliatory Mechanism (ERM)" target="UtilityFunctions" type="CorrelatesTo" description="Weights in utility functions can adapt over time" />

    </Relations>

  </NRT>



  <NRT name="WHM_Application">

    <Entities>

      <Entity ref="StrategicInteraction" />

      <Entity ref="WeightedHarmonicMean" />

      <Entity ref="PlayerStrategies" />

      <Entity ref="GameOutcomes" />

    </Entities>

    <Relations>

      <Relation source="WeightedHarmonicMean" target="StrategicInteraction" type="Quantifies" formula="WHMij = (ERMij + ROij) / (2 * ERMij * ROij)" />

      <Relation source="PlayerStrategies" target="GameOutcomes" type="LeadsTo" />

      <Relation source="WeightedHarmonicMean" target="GameOutcomes" type="Balances" /> 

    </Relations>

  </NRT>

</RT>

System Definition

System: GameTheoryWithWHM
- This system integrates Game Theory concepts with the Weighted Harmonic Mean (WHM).

Spheres

GameTheory
- Attributes: Concept, Relevance
StrategicInteraction
- Attributes: NumPlayers, StrategySet, Outcome
WeightedHarmonicMean
- Attributes: Formula, ERM, RO
UtilityFunctions
- Attributes: Player, Strategy, Outcome, Payoff
TheoreticalPropositions
- Attributes: Proposition, Description

Entities

Concepts and Core Elements
- GameTheory: Relevance in Economics, Political Science, Biology, Psychology.
- StrategicInteraction: A scenario involving 2 players.
- Player1 and Player2: Decision makers involved in the strategic interaction.

Nested Relational Tensors (NRTs)

PlayerStrategies
- Captures the strategies of each player.
- Entities: References to Player1 and Player2with their respective strategies Si and Sj.
GameOutcomes
- Represents the outcomes resulting from the players' strategies.
- Entities: References to Player1 and Player2with their respective outcomes Oi and Oj.
UtilityFunctions
- Models the utility (payoff) each player derives from their choices and outcomes.
- Entities:
  - Player1: Payoff function Ui(Si,Sj)=α∗Oi(Si,Sj)+β∗Oj(Si,Sj)−γ∗C(Si).
  - Player2: Payoff function Uj(Si,Sj)=g(Si,Sj,Oi,Oj).
- Relations:
  - System of Prioritization (SOP) correlates to UtilityFunctions with weights α,β,γ reflecting prioritization in utility functions.
  - Strength of Relation (StOr) correlates to UtilityFunctions aiming to balance benefit (Oi,Oj) and harm (C(Si)).
  - Impact of Relation (ImR) correlates to UtilityFunctions showing impact of strategies on each other.
  - Reconciliatory Mechanisms correlate to UtilityFunctions helping find mutually beneficial outcomes (ROij).
  - Evolution of Reconciliatory Mechanism (ERM) correlates to UtilityFunctions with adaptable weights over time.
WHM_Application
- Shows the application of WHM to quantify and balance strategies and outcomes.
- Entities: References to StrategicInteraction, WeightedHarmonicMean, PlayerStrategies, and GameOutcomes.
- Relations:
  - WeightedHarmonicMeanquantifies StrategicInteraction with formula WHMij=(ERMij+ROij)/(2∗ERMij∗ROij).
  - PlayerStrategies lead to GameOutcomes.
  - WeightedHarmonicMean balances GameOutcomes.

Explanation of the NRTML Representation

Key Pieces on the Game Board

Game Theory: The overarching rulebook explaining the strategic interaction where players' choices affect each other's outcomes.
Strategic Interaction: The specific game scenario involving two players with defined strategies and outcomes.
Weighted Harmonic Mean (WHM): A tool to measure the balance of players' choices and results, akin to a scale that weighs the effectiveness of collaboration.
Utility Functions: Scorecards indicating how satisfied each player is with their choices and the outcomes.
Theoretical Propositions: Guiding principles and tips for making better decisions in the game.

The Players and Their Moves

Player1 and Player2: The two decision-makers, each selecting a strategy.
Player Strategies: The possible strategies for each player.
Game Outcomes: The results based on the strategies chosen by the players.

The Heart of the Game

Utility Functions: Determine each player's satisfaction by considering strategies, outcomes, and the balance of collaboration.
WHM Application: Uses WHM to balance and quantify the strategies and outcomes for optimal results.

Why This is Useful

This NRTML representation provides a detailed guide to understanding strategic interactions. It helps in:

Understanding: Clarifying how choices, rules, and balance affect outcomes.
Prediction: Foreseeing outcomes based on different strategies.
Analysis: Evaluating how well players' strategies balance benefits and costs.

In Summary

This NRTML representation models a strategic interaction between two players, incorporating choices, outcomes, balance, and collaboration. It provides a comprehensive view of the decision-making process, aiding in predicting and understanding the outcomes of different strategies.

Simply Explained:

Imagine a Blueprint for a Strategy Game

Think of the NRTML structure as the design for a complex strategy game. This blueprint lays out the rules, the players, their possible moves, and how everything in the game is connected.

The Essential Parts of the Blueprint

System: GameTheoryWithWHM

This is the overall title of your game design, telling us it combines the ideas of Game Theory (how people make decisions in competitive situations) and the Weighted Harmonic Mean (a math tool for finding a balanced average).

Spheres: Imagine different sections of the rulebook, each explaining a key part of the game:

GameTheory: The basic concept of the game, its importance, and where it's used (like in economics or politics).
StrategicInteraction:The specifics of how the game is played—how many players there are, what choices they can make, and what results those choices could lead to.
WeightedHarmonicMean:This is a special rule in the game. It's a formula that helps figure out how well the players' choices and the results they get are balanced.
UtilityFunctions:Each player has a "scorecard" that shows how satisfied they are with the game. This section explains how that score is calculated.
TheoreticalPropositions: These are additional tips or strategies that can help players understand the game and make better decisions.

Entities: These are like the pieces on the game board:

GameTheory: The overall concept of strategic decision-making.
StrategicInteraction:The specific situation the game is trying to represent (e.g., a negotiation).
Player1 and Player2: The two people playing the game.

Nested Relational Tensors (NRTs): These are sections in the rulebook that explain the relationships between different parts of the game:

PlayerStrategies: This lists all the possible moves or actions each player can take.
GameOutcomes: This lists all the possible results of the game, depending on the choices players make.
UtilityFunctions: This explains how each player's score is calculated based on their strategy, the other player's strategy, and the outcome. The score considers not just winning or losing, but also how well they cooperated or competed.
WHM_Application: This explains how the WHM tool is used to measure the balance between the players' choices and the final outcome. It's like a referee that rewards fairness and cooperation.

How the Game Works:

Players Choose: Each player looks at their PlayerStrategiesand decides what move to make.
Outcomes Happen: Based on the players' choices, a certain outcome happens, as shown in GameOutcomes.
Scores are Calculated: Each player gets a score (Payoff) based on their UtilityFunction. This score reflects how happy they are with the outcome, taking into account their own actions, their opponent's actions, and the overall balance of the game.
WHM Evaluates Balance: The WHM tool is used to assess how well the players' choices and the outcomes match up. It looks for a balance between competition and cooperation.

Why This Game is Helpful:

This "game" isn't just for fun. It's a way to understand how people make decisions in real-life situations where they have to interact with others. It helps us:

Understand: How different choices lead to different outcomes and how people's goals and values affect their decisions.
Predict: What might happen if people choose certain strategies, so we can plan better.
Analyze: How well different strategies work and which ones lead to better outcomes for everyone involved.

Think of it Like This:

Imagine two friends deciding what movie to watch. They each have a list of favorite movies (PlayerStrategies). They'll be happiest if they pick a movie they both like (GameOutcomes). But they might also consider how much they want to please the other friend (UtilityFunctions). The "UtilityFunctions" represent each friend's preferences for different movies, and the WHM helps them find a movie that satisfies both of their preferences in a balanced way. The WHM is a type of average that gives more weight to smaller values, making it useful in scenarios where balance and cooperation are important. The WHM tool is like a friend who helps them find a movie that makes both of them happy and avoids arguments!

NRTML/DNRTML and CML

NRTML/DNRTML is generally better than CML when:

You need a holistic, multi-scale perspective: If you're interested in understanding water's behavior beyond just its molecular structure, and want to see how it interacts with its environment and other systems, NRTML/DNRTML is the superior choice. It allows you to capture the emergent properties that arise from these interactions, which CML cannot.
You're dealing with dynamic systems: If you need to model how water changes over time, like in the water cycle or during phase transitions, DNRTML is essential. CML is primarily static and doesn't handle temporal evolution well.
You want to integrate with AI: If your goal is to use the water data for advanced analysis, prediction, or decision-making with AI, NRTML/DNRTML is more suitable. Its structure is designed for easy integration with AI systems, whereas CML is primarily for data storage and exchange.

CML is better when:

You're focused solely on molecular structure: If your primary interest is in the chemical composition and connectivity of water molecules, CML is sufficient and perhaps even simpler to use. It's specifically designed for this purpose.
You have limited data or computational resources: NRTML/DNRTML can become complex and require more data and computational power to handle effectively. If you're working with simpler models or have constraints, CML might be a more practical choice.

In summary:

NRTML/DNRTML is a more powerful and versatile framework, ideal for understanding the broader context and dynamics of water.
CML is a specialized tool, best suited for focusing on the molecular structure of water.

The "better" choice ultimately depends on your specific needs and goals. If you require a comprehensive, dynamic, and AI-friendly representation of water, NRTML/DNRTML is the way to go. If you're primarily concerned with molecular structure, CML might be sufficient.

NRTML Example Usage

Water - Chemsitry Domain

An NRTML Structure of Game Theory with Weighted Harmonic Mean (WHM)

Reference: https://relationalexistence.com/#:~:text=Mathematical%20Framework%3A%20Combining%20Weighted%20Harmonic%20Mean%20(WH

System Definition

Spheres

Entities

Nested Relational Tensors (NRTs)

Explanation of the NRTML Representation

Key Pieces on the Game Board

The Players and Their Moves

The Heart of the Game

Why This is Useful

In Summary

Simply Explained:

NRTML/DNRTML and CML

This website uses cookies.